NZHondas.com

Go Back   NZHondas.com > NZH - General > General Discussion

General Discussion Please keep all topics Honda/NZ Import Scene/Motorsport related.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17th June 2008, 07:40 PM   #51 (permalink)
canman
Senior Member
4,000rpm (Taxi Drag)
 
canman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 874
Location: Wellington
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I might get chance to do some comparisons on the dyno soon with the Civic as I'm going to get it back on there to tune out some low end (below 2000rpm) drivability stuff so I'll run it on 95 for the first runs, then tune it up for Mobil Ethanol blend.

Had a chat with people today about the Gull 10% ethanol mix and they've got some proven results with that on the dyno. Basically it seems with Ethanol it's more resistant to detonation so you can get more power from running more timing without hassles......

I'll let you know if I get anything concrete, but the seat of the pants 'ometer in my GTR says the Mobil blend is smoother than the Ultimate fuel and much better than the Shell V-Power....
__________________
Cheers
Fraser
canman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 07:53 AM   #52 (permalink)
duncanb
Senior Member
3,000rpm (Grandma Drag)
 
duncanb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 344
Location: Auckland
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicknamed_13 View Post
Family frind had a non turbo Impreza and every time he used Caltex on 95 his car was not running as smooth and seemed to have less performance. On Shell 95 he had more grunt and it was smoother. With my integra I ran 91, 95, 98 and 98 + 5point octane. Ran very smooth on 98 + booster but no difference between rest. Like somone else said, if you're not running ITR, STI, EVO etc 98 is a waste of money. You're better off getting 95 and use octane booster/injector cleaner every now and then.
All of the 95 sold in Auckland comes down a pipeline from the refinery at Marsden Point. Apart from additives such as Caltex Techron, there is NO other difference between the brands.

But the petrol won't always be exactly the same - it may have the same RON rating, but the composition will vary. So you could fill up at Shell one week and Caltex the next, but any difference will be due to variations in refining the petrol, not the brand.
duncanb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 11:57 AM   #53 (permalink)
MMJA
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
MMJA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,849
Location: Howick
Send a message via MSN to MMJA
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Until Shell brings out their 100 octane V-power here, think I'm gona stick with BP 98. May be pricey but guess if you wana drive a performance car you gotta pay the price that comes with it.
__________________
2000 DC2 Integra Type R-X DC Squad Type R Group Aucklanders Unite Eastsiderz
Best ET: 14.62s @ 153.2kph
MMJA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 03:28 PM   #54 (permalink)
dan_onlytwice
Senior Member
700rpm (Idle)
 
dan_onlytwice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 137
Location: Wellington
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Semi related question. I was talking to a guy at Mobil in Paremata today who said that apparently mobil are shifting their Ethanol Blend to a BioEthanol blend, and are as such, removing all of their Eth Blend (97.5 Oct. Min.) until they get this new bio in, but I dont know annything about it, does anyone else?

I personally like the Ethanol Blend as the better high octane fuel - that is over V-Power and Ultimate.
dan_onlytwice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 07:25 PM   #55 (permalink)
Gridlock
Senior Member
4,000rpm (Taxi Drag)
 
Gridlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 608
Location: Wanganui
Send a message via MSN to Gridlock Send a message via Yahoo to Gridlock
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Switched over for a "test" must say its pretty good on economy, pulled mad vtaks as well so must be a 1-up. 98 here is crap it doesnt turn over quite fast so you get the "stale, old stuff"
__________________
My Profile

Last edited by Gridlock; 18th June 2008 at 07:31 PM.
Gridlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 08:28 PM   #56 (permalink)
Speedi
Junior Member
700rpm (Idle)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 18
Location: Auckland
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I used a bit more than half tank and refill it today. 290km and 23 litres. 7.9L/100km with the V-power is not bad for the B18C. It seems to have more pick up after refilling as well.
__________________
98Spec ITR
Merc A160
Speedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008, 09:36 AM   #57 (permalink)
bassplayer
Junior Member
700rpm (Idle)
 
bassplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Auckland
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I can't tell the difference performance wise between the Shell or Mobil and haven't run the car long enough to get a good feel for efficiency. I stick with the mobil 98 cause it's avail at my local.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedi View Post
290km and 23 litres. 7.9L/100km with the V-power is not bad for the B18C. It seems to have more pick up after refilling as well.
Is that much 100km driving? Seems v good efficiency. I do most of my driving in 50kms areas and I'm getting roughly 10.0L/100km out of my CTR. (Not sure if that's good or bad).
__________________
97 EK9 Civic Type R
bassplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 09:55 AM   #58 (permalink)
Macros
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
Macros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,717
Location: Auckland
Send a message via ICQ to Macros Send a message via MSN to Macros
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

lol.
http://www.shell.com/static/nz-en/do...wer_95_tds.pdf

Quote:
V Power petrol contains Shell’s advanced
additive technology, which is designed to protect the engine from the build up of
harmful deposits. This improves performance by keeping clean fuel injectors,
carburettors and inlet valves and leads to consistently good gasoline/air mixture
preparation, better combustion and better driveability.
Quote:
DESCRIPTION UNITS METHODS TYPICAL
V Power
Colour - Visual Yellow
Octane Number - ASTM D2699 95.2
Distillation - ASTM D86
% evaporated @ 70oC % - 25
% evaporated @ 100oC % - 47
% evaporated @ 150oC % - 87
Final Boiling Point OC. - 200
Copper Corrosion (2 hr @ 100 oC) - ASTM D130 1a
Benzene % vol. ASTM D5580 0.95
Sulphur mg/kg ASTM D5453 20
Macros is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 10:08 AM   #59 (permalink)
SK1TZ- EF
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
SK1TZ- EF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,570
Location: Upper Hutt
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

those saying its not worth BP98 in a stock car havent done any real tests IMHO

those that know me know that I do a fuckload of KMs, and I get $50 a week free from work, but its on a caltex card, so its Techron 95 usually....

it goes down pretty quick when doing heavy driving, and is average at best when taking it easy..

if I put in BP98, it last faaarken ages compared, personally with the price going up soo much lately, you dont notice any price diff with 98 anyways.....so personally I prefer 98 Ultimate.

I did put in $30 of V power in on friday, and it hasnt gone down as fast as I thought it would...will have to try a tank at some stage, see what I get

sam
__________________
"Family Guy had better not show the Prophet Mohammed tonight....I'm Serious, c'mon, its not even that funny"
SK1TZ- EF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 10:11 AM   #60 (permalink)
SK1TZ- EF
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
SK1TZ- EF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,570
Location: Upper Hutt
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

just a side note, what is teh Brand of Mobil high octane?? is it synergy 5000??

got told by the dude at Mobil that "Synergy 5000 is the same as 98"

I think he was being a BS artist, but not sure
__________________
"Family Guy had better not show the Prophet Mohammed tonight....I'm Serious, c'mon, its not even that funny"
SK1TZ- EF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 10:22 AM   #61 (permalink)
Macros
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
Macros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,717
Location: Auckland
Send a message via ICQ to Macros Send a message via MSN to Macros
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Quote:
Originally Posted by SK1TZ- EF View Post
got told by the dude at Mobil that "Synergy 5000 is the same as 98"
Synergy 8000

Synergy 5000 is 95.

Synergy - Mobil Fuel System - Product Selection
Macros is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 10:38 AM   #62 (permalink)
d16a7
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
d16a7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,934
Location: Auckland
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

sucks for me.. i need to run 98.. car tuned on it.. and its high compression + boost.. so need as little chance of detonation as possible..

what i dont get is why bp 98 is 2.269 and 96/5 is 2.17... surely cant cost THAT much difference to make it..
__________________
PROJECT EJ - D Ninja
d16a7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 11:50 AM   #63 (permalink)
SK1TZ- EF
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
SK1TZ- EF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,570
Location: Upper Hutt
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macros View Post
Synergy 8000

Synergy 5000 is 95.

Synergy - Mobil Fuel System - Product Selection
Sweet, thought so...

My calling him a cocksucking fuckwit behind his back was warranted, lol
__________________
"Family Guy had better not show the Prophet Mohammed tonight....I'm Serious, c'mon, its not even that funny"
SK1TZ- EF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 10:15 PM   #64 (permalink)
sk-itr
Senior Member
3,000rpm (Grandma Drag)
 
sk-itr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 290
Location: Auckland
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I didnt think that V power Shell petrol was that good in my ITR. Hate those BP bumps when used to fill 98 Ultimate from BP now I changed to Shell V power and really like it.
sk-itr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008, 10:47 PM   #65 (permalink)
SLOTEG
Senior Member
8,000rpm (B Series Redline!)
 
SLOTEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,446
Location: Carterton
Send a message via MSN to SLOTEG
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

i have a full tank of gull biofuel onboard at the moment, so far its around 380km from 40L and i still have a quarter tank left, gonna see if it compares with my normal 95 tankload.
my last full tank was pak'n'save 95, as the 10c off a litre helps me out a fair bit (1500km a week) with the cost and i did 542km/40L full to empty
dont really notice if there is more power or not on each blend, as im doin 100km for 75% of my daily drive and only drop a gear/wot to pass and climb the hills and do the twisty bits
also, the biofuel smells a little funny
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWDOWN
I dont mind admitting I dont like you ... nobody on this forum particularly likes you..


SLOTEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2008, 08:30 AM   #66 (permalink)
dazznz
Senior Member
5,000rpm (VTEC Power!)
 
dazznz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,371
Location: Auckland
Send a message via MSN to dazznz
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I can't believe that you guys can tell a difference between power and performance on any of these fuels. If you look at people that run race fuel, most of them are not doing it for power or anything, they do it because it does not burn as hot as normal gas. The way i understand it is the higher the octane rating the lower ther burn temp.

Untill i put the new highly stung motor in my teg, i always used to run it on Shell 95. Never had any issues doing this, and that was always when i was racing, so i don't really see the need for road cars to being running on 98......
dazznz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2008, 11:58 AM   #67 (permalink)
SK1TZ- EF
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
SK1TZ- EF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,570
Location: Upper Hutt
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I dont notice a huge power increase with teh 98, but as I said, it seems to get me better KMs from a tank
__________________
"Family Guy had better not show the Prophet Mohammed tonight....I'm Serious, c'mon, its not even that funny"
SK1TZ- EF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2008, 04:32 PM   #68 (permalink)
Dionysus
Senior Member
5,000rpm (VTEC Power!)
 
Dionysus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,071
Location: North Shore City
Send a message via MSN to Dionysus
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Hmm, I have a year's worth of mileage for filling my civic on 98, I wonder if I should chuck 91 or 95 in for a month and see if there is any difference.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTAKYO View Post
I am comfortable at home, never to pay rent
Awesome
Dionysus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 12:32 PM   #69 (permalink)
tarmac-
Senior Member
5,000rpm (VTEC Power!)
 
tarmac-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,438
Location: Auckland
Send a message via MSN to tarmac-
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dionysus View Post
Hmm, I have a year's worth of mileage for filling my civic on 98, I wonder if I should chuck 91 or 95 in for a month and see if there is any difference.

Yeh do it, see how it goes.
__________________
dnb drops
tarmac- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2008, 12:32 PM   #70 (permalink)
SK1TZ- EF
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
SK1TZ- EF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,570
Location: Upper Hutt
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

I wouldnt put 91 in anything....not even a lawnmower, its that shitty a fuel, only good for firebombs....they must sell a fair bit of 91 in Invercargill, lol
__________________
"Family Guy had better not show the Prophet Mohammed tonight....I'm Serious, c'mon, its not even that funny"
SK1TZ- EF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2008, 09:54 AM   #71 (permalink)
tarmac-
Senior Member
5,000rpm (VTEC Power!)
 
tarmac-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,438
Location: Auckland
Send a message via MSN to tarmac-
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Quote:
Originally Posted by SK1TZ- EF View Post
I wouldnt put 91 in anything....not even a lawnmower, its that shitty a fuel, only good for firebombs....they must sell a fair bit of 91 in Invercargill, lol

Nothing wrong with the stuff if youve got a stock lowish compression engine.! You will gain no more power, by just changing petrol if your engine isnt tuned for it!
__________________
dnb drops
tarmac- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2008, 08:21 PM   #72 (permalink)
lincooln
Member
700rpm (Idle)
 
lincooln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 82
Location: Outside NZ: United States
Send a message via MSN to lincooln
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

i dont know aye. I had it in my standard suzuki vitara and it started causing knocking, smoke, lack of power etc. put 95 in it and its all gone away. tried 98 just to see what happens and well it did shit all. to be honest
__________________
-100kg = -0.1 on the quarter. What happens When you add 500 more hp?
lincooln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2008, 11:23 AM   #73 (permalink)
MyH22A
Senior Member
3,000rpm (Grandma Drag)
 
MyH22A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 339
Location: Christchurch
Send a message via ICQ to MyH22A Send a message via MSN to MyH22A
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Quote:
Originally Posted by lincooln View Post
i dont know aye. I had it in my standard suzuki vitara and it started causing knocking, smoke, lack of power etc. put 95 in it and its all gone away. tried 98 just to see what happens and well it did shit all. to be honest
U mighta noticed a difference if you reset the ECU via the Battery terminal for a couple min's i did it once i got hm after filling up the next day i drove it hard for a bit then parked it up at work till lunchtime. It seemed like my car had more life in her when i went out for lunch that day.

I managed to get 8.1/100km round town pretty close to someone else's economy further up the pg 7.9L/100km but then its 2.2 over 1.8 mayeb thats why, & i didnt drive like a nana all the time either.

So after using V-power for about a month now i'd give it the thumb's up bein that its fairly economical and not much lesser performance than 98 i dont think ill go back to 98 to tell the truth it's to expensive and all you rich bastard's with deep wallet's that wanna cry no 98 is the shit only get that, have you even try'd v-power you maybe plesently surprised, cus I find the problem with 98 your always tempted to put your foot down more just to feel that extra couple of horse power you may gain, V-power is defintly the best right now over mobil's 95, gull or gas as there know'n down here and catex's techron too, dunno about challenge i never go there.

I think Ferrari did well and from reading there little pamflet in there stations you can grab, I think they got it spot on with the additive's they put in it.
__________________
/forum/groups/34-prelude-s-downunder.html
May The Vtec Be with U!
MyH22A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2008, 11:49 AM   #74 (permalink)
SK1TZ- EF
Senior Member
7,000rpm (Peak Power)
 
SK1TZ- EF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,570
Location: Upper Hutt
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

yea, well I have been putting in V power when I have had to use my own gas, and its better than caltex, which I think is shitty as hell,(but works got a starcard) and a good, cheaper replacement for my oh so loved 98.

my 2c, again

sam
__________________
"Family Guy had better not show the Prophet Mohammed tonight....I'm Serious, c'mon, its not even that funny"
SK1TZ- EF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2008, 05:52 PM   #75 (permalink)
Dionysus
Senior Member
5,000rpm (VTEC Power!)
 
Dionysus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,071
Location: North Shore City
Send a message via MSN to Dionysus
Re: Shell V-Power vs BP 98 oct

Ok, from next week I will try V power after two years of 98, for two months.

Note, I drive virtually identically each week, same amount of k's, same kind of driving, with the exception of two attempted economy tanks, which improved my efficiency my 200mls!

This won't be a power test (as mentioned by Dazz) the effect is imagined, but purely economy.

Ah crap, anyone know how I can put excel data up so it's all lined up properly?


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTAKYO View Post
I am comfortable at home, never to pay rent
Awesome

Last edited by Dionysus; 4th July 2008 at 06:13 PM.
Dionysus is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

«